Links
Home
Oracle DBA Forum
Frequent Oracle Errors
TNS:could not resolve the connect identifier specified
Backtrace message unwound by exceptions
invalid identifier
PL/SQL compilation error
internal error
missing expression
table or view does not exist
end-of-file on communication channel
TNS:listener unknown in connect descriptor
insufficient privileges
PL/SQL: numeric or value error string
TNS:protocol adapter error
ORACLE not available
target host or object does not exist
invalid number
unable to allocate string bytes of shared memory
resource busy and acquire with NOWAIT specified
error occurred at recursive SQL level string
ORACLE initialization or shutdown in progress
archiver error. Connect internal only, until freed
snapshot too old
unable to extend temp segment by string in tablespace
Credential retrieval failed
missing or invalid option
invalid username/password; logon denied
unable to create INITIAL extent for segment
out of process memory when trying to allocate string bytes
shared memory realm does not exist
cannot insert NULL
TNS:unable to connect to destination
remote database not found'>ora-02019
exception encountered: core dump
inconsistent datatypes
no data found
TNS:operation timed out
PL/SQL: could not find program
existing state of packages has been discarded
maximum number of processes exceeded
error signaled in parallel query server
ORACLE instance terminated. Disconnection forced
TNS:packet writer failure
see ORA-12699
missing right parenthesis
name is already used by an existing object
cannot identify/lock data file
invalid file operation
quoted string not properly terminated
Library Cache Lock

Library Cache Lock

2004-01-29       - By Sai Selvaganesan

Reply:     1     2     3     4     5     6     7     8     9     10     >>  

hi jonathan

i have faced a similar issue and please see whether
the below is what u are facing.
we used to analyze tables (estimate statistics) and
when snapshot refresh used to happen in the same time,
there was library cache locking in the database and no
dml will go thru.this happens until the snapshots are
done. for a few sundays(on whcih analyze was being
done)i used to think analyze was causing this issue
this because when u do check x$kgllk analzye session
used to show up in the top. but a system dump showed
otherwise.i think snapshot was doing a xclusive lock
of the master table instead of a shareable lock when
refresh was going thru(i may be wrong here) .probably
will be noticeable in a very highly concurrent oltp
with a number of snapshot sites. but i was able to
give oracle a test case in 8.1.7.4.
when materilaized view refreshes go thru it does that
library cache lock which can be disabled setting an
event on the source database(db where the mv logs
are). i think this event is 32333 but there is a
downside to this which says query rewrite on mvs will
not work. this event disables some mlog$ verification.

hope this helps
sai
--- Jonathan Lewis <jonathan@(protected) >
wrote:
>
> 8.1.7.4
> Windows 2000 Server
> ca.200 sessions, about 30 active.
>
> About a dozen sessions go into waits
> for Library Cache Lock for the best
> part of 300 seconds. (At which they
> probably all get ORA-04021 (See ORA-04021.ora-code.com) and free
> themselves, but I couldn 't tell, the problem
> happened a few minutes before I was due to
> leave the site, and the end-users were
> on the other side of the Atlantic). The
> odd session might get a library cache pin
> wait.
>
> The object they were waiting for (tracked
> via x$kglob.kglhdadr = v$session_wait.p1raw)
> was a table. No-one has done ANYTHING
> untoward to the table, such as truncate, add column,
> index, analyze, for at least 3 days. The table is
> a normal heap table with half a dozen indexes.
>
> The best bet I could come up with was a
> metalink item that mentioned conflicts relating
> to materialized views - and there is a materialized
> view log on this table.
>
> The only other relevant detail I could come up
> with is that sessions create a session, work hard
> for a few seconds, then drop the session
> (maintaining
> the connection) so the system may be exercising some
> part of the code that creates x$kgllk items rather
> more
> heavily than is normal.
>
> Any thoughts ? Any similar experiences ?
>
>
> Regards
>
> Jonathan Lewis
> http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk
>
> The educated person is not the person
> who can answer the questions, but the
> person who can question the answers -- T. Schick
> Jr
>
>
> Next public appearances:
> Jan 29th 2004 UKOUG Unix SIG - v$ and x$
> March 2004 Hotsos Symposium - The Burden of Proof
> March 2004 Charlotte NC OUG - CBO Tutorial
> April 2004 Iceland
>
>
> One-day tutorials:
> http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/tutorial.html
>
>
> Three-day seminar:
> see http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/seminar.html
> ____UK___February
> ____UK___June
>
>
> The Co-operative Oracle Users ' FAQ
> http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html
>
>
>
>
-- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ------
> Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ:
> http://www.orafaq.com
>
-- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ------
> To unsubscribe send email to:
> oracle-l-request@(protected)
> put 'unsubscribe ' in the subject line.
> --
> Archives are at
> http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
> FAQ is at
> http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
>
-- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- --

-- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@(protected)
put 'unsubscribe ' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- --